ChatGPT couldn't have Watch The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift Onlinewritten a better outcome for the lawyers who used the AI chatbot to file a lawsuit filled with citations of completely non-existent cases.
On Thursday, a federal judge decidednot to impose sanctions that could've derailed the careers of attorneys Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca of the law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman.
Judge P. Kevin Castel instead let the lawyers off with a slap on the wrist: A $5,000 fine for acting in "bad faith."
Basically, the judge decided to impose a fine on the two attorneys for “shifting and contradictory explanations” and lying to the court at first when trying to defend the legal filing they submitted which cited six cases that simply did not exist.
Castel also orderedthe lawyers to notify the judges that were cited in their error-laden legal filing as the authors of the six fake cases created whole cloth by ChatGPT. While the cases were made-up, the judges that ChatGPT attached to them all exist.
The judge felt the subsequent apologies from the lawyers sufficed and did not warrant further sanctions.
In his ruling, Castel noted that he didn't have a problem with the use of AI in law. However, the lawyers were negligent in their duty to make sure the research was accurate.
“Technological advances are commonplace and there is nothing inherently improper about using a reliable artificial intelligence tool for assistance,” the judge said. “But existing rules impose a gatekeeping role on attorneys to ensure the accuracy of their filings.”
SEE ALSO: The dark web is overflowing with stolen ChatGPT accountsWhile things could've gone much worse for Schwartz and LoDuca, the law firm is considering an appeal.
“We respectfully disagree with the finding that anyone at our firm acted in bad faith," Levidow, Levidow & Oberman said in a statement. "We have already apologized to the Court and our client. We continue to believe that in the face of what even the Court acknowledged was an unprecedented situation, we made a good faith mistake in failing to believe that a piece of technology could be making up cases out of whole cloth.”
This saga began when a client of the firm wanted to sue an airline after they allegedly injured their knee on a flight. Schwartz took up the case and used ChatGPT for his legal research. The AI chatbot returned six similar previous cases it claimed it had found and the lawyer included this into his filing. Everything was signed off by LoDuca, who technically was representing the client as he is admitted to the federal courts whereas Schwartz is not.
Unfortunately for the two lawyers, ChatGPT completely fabricated those six cases and the two attempted to argue their way out of admitting they wholly depended on an AI chatbot and did not lookover its claims.
As for that underlying case brought by their client against the airline, the judge tossed the case due to the statute of limitations expiring.
Topics Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT OpenAI
Facebook Live captures tragic aftermath of police shooting in El CajonPepe the Frog cartoon added to online hate symbol databaseFleet Foxes frontman bestows his sweater upon a fan who made a Tumblr for itCould a revenge porn case in Northern Ireland change Facebook across the planet?10 unique online marketing methods that most business owners don't know aboutSearch privately on your iPhone with Google app's new incognito modeSurfer gets surprise of his life when dolphin jumps onto his boardSerena Williams on police violence: 'I will not be silent'Ignorant muggles put another Harry Potter home up for saleWill and Kate face greatest diplomatic challenge yet, and it's phallic clamsAn insurance company is subsidizing Apple Watches for its customersThis amazing 'Fantastic Beasts' trailer will make you weep wizard tearsA 'safe' Note7 exploded and destroyed this guy's MacBook Pro with itSearch privately on your iPhone with Google app's new incognito mode'Street Fighter V' Capcom Cup is coming to California in DecemberCafe trolls Donald Trump with an unusual sandwich recipeTea in a spray can is the weirdest way to make your daily cupMatt Ryan may have just made the greatest nonKim Kardashian wants to help find a bone marrow match for a friend19 times the Hillary shimmy GIF perfectly describes what you're going through Beer, sushi and hope: Voters election nights are all planned out Assange says he isn't dropping emails to swing the U.S. election Guy investigated for using a drone to fly to the store and pick up his lunch Warm records blew cold records away by the thousands last month Deeply inspiring woman twerks her way to the polls A nation starved for details on Taylor Swift's ballot turns to Google Australia offers 'democracy sausages' to Americans in their hour of need This woman just became the first Somali Tammy Duckworth keeps smashing glass ceilings Brands need to stop telling people to go vote Trump gets confused by difference between 'county' and 'country' Good luck, America: You just elected Donald Trump president Almost no one was ready for this photo of Donald Trump's election results party Clinton calls and concedes as Trump takes the stage CNN turned the Empire State Building into a giant television. Taylor Swift went to the polls and quietly revealed who she's voting for Van Jones just summed up why a Trump win would be so painful Amazon Alexa is just as nervous about the election as you If you also speak 'Lolihan,' Lindsay Lohan made a shirt for you 9 times British Twitter narrated the U.S. election in glorious fashion
2.3432s , 10131.796875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Watch The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift Online】,New Knowledge Information Network