Democratic primary candidate for president,umayyad eroticism Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, has filed a lawsuitagainst Google over claims of “election interference.”
In the complaintfiled by Gabbard’s campaign committee, Tulsi Now Inc., the congresswoman alleges that the search giant suspended her presidential campaign’s Google ad account after the first Democratic primary debates last month.
Gabbard seeks damages of up to $50 million and an injunction prohibiting Google from taking any further action against the account in the future.
The lawsuit alleges the company suspended her advertising account for 6 hours in total following the debates, hurting Gabbard’s ability to raise money and reach out to potential voters. The campaign is accusing Google of violating Gabbard’s First Amendment rights.
“Gabbard quickly became the most searched-for Democratic presidential candidate on June 27-28,” the lawsuit states. “In the crucial post-debate period -- a time when presidential candidates receive outsize interest, engagement, and donations -- Americans around the country wanted to hear more from Tulsi Gabbard.
In a statement provided to Mashable, the search engine explains that a sudden increase in ad spending had caused Rep. Gabbard’s Google Ads account to be automatically flagged.
"We have automated systems that flag unusual activity on all advertiser accounts -- including large spending changes -- in order to prevent fraud and protect our customers,” said Google spokeswoman Riva Sciuto. “In this case, our system triggered a suspension and the account was reinstated shortly thereafter. We are proud to offer ad products that help campaigns connect directly with voters, and we do so without bias toward any party or political ideology."
In the complaint, Gabbard also alleges “Google’s email platform Gmail sends communications from Tulsi into people’s Spam folders at a disproportionately high rate.” The campaign claims Gabbard’s emails land in spam folders at “a rate higher than those from other Democratic presidential candidates.”
The Gabbard campaign quickly announced the lawsuit in a statementon its website using the URL “Tulsi vs. Google.” A breaking news header highlighted on the main pages states “Tulsi Takes Google to Court Over Election Interference.”
In the statement, titled “Tulsi Fights Back Against Big Tech's Dangerous Dominance,” Gabbard frames the lawsuit as another fight against the big tech monopolies that so many Democratic primary candidates have spoken out about this election season.
“Google controls 88 percent of all internet search in the United States – essentially giving it control over our access to information,” says Gabbard’s campaign website. “That’s one reason why Tulsi has been a vocal proponent of breaking up the tech monopolies.”
It should be noted, however, that other Democratic candidates, like Elizabeth Warren, have proposed breaking up the big tech companies, like Google, in the name of consumer protection due to companies’ anticompetitive practices.
Gabbard, however, is contending in her lawsuit that Google is purposefully targeting certain politicians based on their beliefs -- a notionmore in linewith Republicans’ argumentagainstthe big tech companies.
Topics Google Elections Politics
15 Netflix hiddenSnapchat has a new section for Stories from verified accountsIn a new Intel ad, LeBron James promotes safety of selfNutella pasta is the fusion dessert you'll probably have an opinion aboutThe energy at the Grace Hopper Celebration is enough to make you less cynical about tech'Star Wars: The Last Jedi': Porgs are greatApple's Face ID could be coming to iPads next, report saysHilarie Burton speaks about Ben Affleck's Harvey Weinstein statementGoogle got duped by a fake ad blocker, and 37,000 people accidentally downloaded adwareThe captivating story of 'Dirty John' is your next podcast obsessionOculus for Business will enable companies to work in VRMost Australians don't care about being on a mass facial recognition databaseThe FAA still hasn't refunded by $5 drone registration feeKesha's Rainbow Tour is the pop victory lap 2017 needs: ReviewHorrifying New Yorker exposé sheds more light on disturbing Harvey Weinstein allegations'The Last Jedi' full trailer revealed: What it all meansKit Harrington and Rose Leslie pause Game of Thrones for weddingOh, if only the 10 year reunion for Australian party boy Corey Worthington was realMark Zuckerberg apologizes for that awkward VR tour of Puerto RicoEquifax hackers got 10 million driver's licenses Professor Bhaer in Film: Watching “Little Women” At Last, We Answer Patricia Lockwood's Excellent Tweet Umberto Eco: “How to Travel with a Salmon” In France, Rereading Old Diaries Soviet Film Director Sergei Eisenstein's British Holiday Writ in Water: The Enduring Mystery of Keats’s Last Words David Szalay Wins Plimpton Prize; Chris Bachelder Wins Southern Prize Who Is Professor Bhaer? Part 3 of an Ongoing Investigation Lydia Davis Will Receive Our 2016 Hadada Award The Sound Effects of the Eighteenth Century, Back in Action Staff Picks: Bissell, Panter, Aridjis, Krasznahorkai Read an Interview with Paul Beatty, NBCC Fiction Winner My Life Polishing Silver Little Man of Nuremberg: Wonder in the Age of Matthias Buchinger On the Merits of Disturbing Literature To Die, To Sleep, And Other News Our New Spring Issue: Interviews with Luc Sante, Robert Caro Solve These Rhyming Riddles and Win a Free Subscription When Homero Aridjis Was Ten, He Accidentally Shot Himself How Mark Twain’s Ghost Haunted Copyright Law
2.0004s , 10194.890625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【umayyad eroticism】,New Knowledge Information Network