It's no secret that premium smartphones are Discuss Sectionselling for fatter and fatter stacks of cash these days. Now, the government is saying that's a problem — but not for the reason you might think.
The Federal Trade Commission brought an antitrust suit against chip-maker Qualcomm in 2017, and it's just now playing out in court. Per CNET, the suit alleges that Qualcomm took advantage of a non-competitive marketplace to overcharge Apple and other smartphone makers for use of its chips, technology, and intellectual property.
SEE ALSO: Bad news for iPhone users: Apple dumps QualcommSo while yes, the latest iPhones carry a premium price because Apple keeps tricking them out with more premium features and ever crazier cameras, there are other reasons smartphones have hit hard-to-swallow new pricing plateaus. Across the entire market, smartphones might be more affordable if Qualcomm hadn't demanded such a sizable cut of manufacturer revenue as a royalty for using its tech.
Court findings may show that Qualcomm took advantage of its exclusivity for a time — a Qualcomm executive reportedly strong-armed an Apple exec into paying its prices by saying "I'm your only choice, and I know Apple can afford to pay it.”
But that was back in 2013, and Apple hasn't been exclusive with Qualcomm for some time. All iPhones came with Qualcomm chips until 2016, when some iPhone 7 and 7 Plus models started to come with Intel chips. iPhone X models came with both Qualcomm and Intel chips. And the most recent line of 2018 iPhones came exclusively with Intel chips.
iPhones didn't pass the $1,000 price tag until the iPhone X models, when Qualcomm was no longer the exclusive supplier. Apple was also said to be pursuing a strategy of a high-end premium product to increase revenue. But Qualcomm wasn't its exclusive partner at that point either.
Apple's strategy has already inspired a backlash. Thanks to decreased iPhone sales, specifically in China, Apple recently had to revise its revenue projections, causing a pause in stock trading and a resulting drop in stock prices. Some saw this as proof that iPhones are too dang expensive.
Is Qualcomm entirely to blame for the premium cost of smartphones? As the situation with Apple proves, the story is likely more complicated than that. We'll just have to wait and see what the justice system thinks.
Topics Apple Intel iPhone
Previous：The State of PC Gaming in 2016
Big-League Bluster
Mom has lunch in same restaurant as Andrew Garfield, boldly asks him to record video for her son
Cruise driverless taxi service launches in SF
Mindy Kaling burns Trump twice in powerful commencement speech
Waymo data shows humans are terrible drivers compared to AI
Macron straight
Apple's App Store will now let developers unlist apps
Twitter starts showing dislike button on replies globally
New MIT report reveals energy costs of AI tools like ChatGPT
So, here's a wax figure of Ed Sheeran casually surrounded by cats
AMD Radeon RX 550 + Intel Pentium G4560
GoFundMe pulls donations from anti
The FCC's internet 'nutrition label' requirement, explained
'Love Actually' made a language mistake that still haunts me
Best robot vacuum deal: Save $140 on roborock Q7 Max Robot Vacuum
Spotify will add a content advisory to *any* podcast discussing COVID
Man buys massive photo of a bridge that's right outside his window
How to use low power mode on a Mac, for when you need to conserve battery on your computer
NYT Strands hints, answers for May 18
Viral TikTok recipe for $1 air fryer breakfast tacos actually rules
'Last Jedi' haters: Remember some fans hated 'Empire Strikes Back' tooEdward Snowden and human rights groups slam NSA bill that's rushing through CongressApple may be slowing down old iPhones on purpose to save battery life'Misinformer of the Year' award goes to Mark ZuckerbergChina reiterates stance on internet regulation to Google and FacebookThe Uber ban in London only hurts the people who need it the mostThis genius scale doesn't actually tell you how much you weighGorgeous 'Gorogoa' is a refreshing new take on puzzle gamesTwitter has people timing songs perfectly for New Year's Eve midnightWhat is MoviePass? They just hit 1 million subscribersHow to be a responsible citizen of the internet in a postThis student's story about her first college exam is so hilariously cringyFacebook's face recognition helps blind users identify who's in photosGondwana Wines is a majorityGet ready for a frigid Christmas in the central U.S.Everything in Star Wars has a backstory, even Poe Dameron's jewelryElon Musk accidentally tweets phone number to Oculus executiveRefugee mother tells her family's story in powerful animated videoEU court's ruling is another tough hit for UberApple may be slowing down old iPhones on purpose to save battery life John and Yves Berger on Painting by John and Yves Berger Best flower delivery deals: Save up to 30% on Valentine's Day flower arrangements and more Antarctica has way more penguins than scientists thought, which is great, because penguins What you shouldn't do while wearing Apple Vision Pro Wordle today: The answer and hints for February 8 Google Maps can now take you deep inside this fiery volcano Homeland Security is hiring AI experts A Rose Diary by Walt John Pearce Is 'The Last of Us Part II Remastered' worth it? Arachnids by Daniel Poppick The Psychopathology of Everyday Café Life in Freud’s Vienna by Deborah Levy Taylor Swift drops 'The Tortured Poets Department' tracklist and Swifties are theorizing Fifth Sleeper: Gérard Maillet by Sophie Calle On Writing Advice and the People Who Give It by Sheila Heti Hannah Arendt, Poet by Srikanth Reddy Best sex toy deals: Save 20% on Ava's entire Amazon storefront Earth just had its second Making of a Poem: Mark Leidner on “Sissy Spacek” by Mark Leidner Disney+ is now restricting password sharing in the U.S. India's Silicon Valley gets a seriously impressive vertical garden
1.9744s , 10107.515625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Discuss Section】,New Knowledge Information Network