【Eric Falk】

YouTube Kids is Eric Falkhere to protect all the children who can't do basic math.

The current version of the kids app comes with a set of parental controls meant to ensure adults can both track what their children watch and set boundaries for age-appropriate content. The only problem is that the parental-control lock is easily bypassed. And yes, it's so easy even a kid could do it.

YouTube has been accused of allowing disturbing content on its platform for years. Earlier this week, Google announced a new standalone YouTube Kids website and additional parental controls in an attempt to make its app more kid appropriate. Which, again, would be good if they weren't so easily defeated.

At issue are two key points: YouTube Kids' "content settings" and "clear history." The app allows parents to decide what online content is appropriate for their precious bundle of joy in three categories: 4 and under, ages 5 to 7, and ages 8 to 12.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Once a parent decides this, a child is locked into that age group when using the app. Unless said child changes it, that is.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

If a parent fails to set a custom password, the only impediment to a kid altering the "content settings" is their ability to smash buttons repeatedly. That's because, as a parental check, the app asks the presumed parent to solve a basic math problem.

Even assuming a 7-year-old kid is unable to figure out "4 X 5 = ?" (a real example from the app), the app allows you to repeatedly enter the same number over and over again until it happens to be correct — thus letting you access a settings page where you can change the age restrictions.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

We tried this out and found it ridiculously easy to access the "locked" parental controls section. Once in, we could change our "content settings" to allow us to view additional material deemed suitable for older kids, or erase our watch history entirely to hide it from a theoretical concerned parent.

Somehow, we don't think repeatedly entering random numbers into a phone is beyond the skill level of most kids.

SEE ALSO: YouTube belatedly decides to ban intentionally disturbing 'kids' videos

Importantly, the app does allow parents to set a custom 4-digit PIN — and adults looking to protect their children from inappropriate content should definitely do so. However, perhaps an even better approach would be to not download YouTube Kids in the first place.

---

Featured Video For You

---

YouTube bans intentionally disturbing kids videos

---

Topics Google YouTube

• Shopping
• Games
• Life
• Science
• Digital Culture
• Social Good
• Tech
• Deals

• Best Kindle Unlimited deal: Get 3 months of Kindle Unlimited for 99 cents
• Tennis legend John McEnroe thinks Serena Williams would rank 700th in the world if she was a man
• Obama writes inspiring plea for health care; Trump tweets about Comey
• Aly Raisman endured some creepy comments on live TV—and people are pissed
• Insane wildfire photo perfectly sums up America in 2017
• Toilet charity wants to rename Indian village after Trump, but it's for a good cause
• Toilet charity wants to rename Indian village after Trump, but it's for a good cause
• Disney and Pixar's new film 'Luca' will spend a summer in the Italian Riviera
• Operation Mensch
• Airbnb might launch a premium option where the rooms are just like hotels

• Wrestlemania winner enters ring with badass 'Game of Thrones' entrance
• Fall into a delightful rabbit hole with the #ArchivesDanceParty hashtag
• Snapchat iPhone X face lens review: Cool, but not a killer new feature
• 'Black Panther' sinks 'Titanic' with another broken box office record
• Mom 'embarrassed' that her daughter uses Blake Shelton's old textbook
• If Apple breaks from Intel, will Macs get cheaper?
• Denmark hired a tech ambassador. After what happened with Facebook, maybe every country should.
• Chief Taco Officer could be your next career move
• 5 questions Mark Zuckerberg should answer in front of Congress
• Everything you need to know about equal pay day

• The cicadas aren't invading the U.S.
• 'Yes God Yes' is a sweet, sly story of sexual awakening: Movie review
• Wilford Brimley, beloved acting fave and star of 'Cocoon,' is dead at 85
• Disney and Pixar's new film 'Luca' will spend a summer in the Italian Riviera
• Supercharge Your Desktop and Mobile Productivity With These Clipboard Managers
• Justice Dept. charged three people in connection with the Twitter hack
• Scientists honor David Bowie by naming a 100
• Microsoft's Cortana is saying goodbye to Android and iOS in 2021
• Astronomers saw one galaxy impale another. The damage was an eye
• I'm not sure who 'Muppets Now' is for, but I think weed is involved

• The EPA axed its climate change websites, but NASA's are still intact
• 7 wedding apps that will make planning your big day a whole lot easier
• The new iPhone 12 is going to be late this year
• XPrize to give $5 million to creator of cheap, fast COVID
• 'Mario Kart World' Nintendo Direct: 3 takeaways
• Twitter finally bans white supremacist David Duke
• Fyre Festival's official merch is up for auction. Remember that happened?
• Wearables are just fine, market expected to double by 2021
• 'Severance' Season 3 gets confirmed by Apple
• Airbnb might launch a premium option where the rooms are just like hotels